As always the use and experience on how trim behaves over time is a result of the actual conditions at site: fluid, chemical composition of fluid, temperature, impurities, layout in pipeline etc.
If the end user has good experience with 'pure' monel trim, and this exists on the market at a 'reasonable' price as deemed by your customer, you have very little chance to convince the end user.
As a buyer I would only accept anything else as a replacement from a well-known valvetrim if the known product had obtained 'disadvantages' over time, mainly perhaps to high price or too long deliverytime.
If a replacement is to be considered I would at least have required references from the producer/principal for (exact) equal installations in long-time use. Your customer should be free to contact the references/existing users.
What about long-term guarantee from your customer, free trial (long-term) or free replacing with required product after trial if not so good as expected? (In short: how far will your principal be willing to back up what he is saying? This question will often reveal 'the truth', by turning your question in reality over to the construction department at your principal, in stead to a sales organization....)
In addition it would be sensible to compare in detail your constructional details to installed and described products.
But chemical reasoning? SS316 is not monel, and will have disadvantages for some fluids, an overlay might be worn away, or construction details could expose bare SS316.