Oct 21, 2020 #1 Don56 Mechanical Feb 18, 2015 203 US I am not a chemist so I ask for your help. We have a customer asking for transport vessels to haul Monomethylamine 50% aqueous solution. Is it corrosive to steel (ASME/ASTM SA-517)? Is SA-240-304 or 316 a better or necessary option?
I am not a chemist so I ask for your help. We have a customer asking for transport vessels to haul Monomethylamine 50% aqueous solution. Is it corrosive to steel (ASME/ASTM SA-517)? Is SA-240-304 or 316 a better or necessary option?
Oct 21, 2020 #2 EdStainless Materials May 20, 2004 15,925 Waukesha WI USA Google broken? Look up the DOT rules for it. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed Upvote 0 Downvote
Google broken? Look up the DOT rules for it. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
Oct 21, 2020 Thread starter #3 Don56 Mechanical Feb 18, 2015 203 US Ed Google was of little help. 49 CFR 173.315 didn't help either. Upvote 0 Downvote
Oct 21, 2020 #4 EdStainless Materials May 20, 2004 15,925 Waukesha WI USA I would try contacting Eastman and asking what materials of construction they recommend. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed Upvote 0 Downvote
I would try contacting Eastman and asking what materials of construction they recommend. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
Oct 21, 2020 #5 Latexman Chemical Sep 24, 2003 6,925 US Agree, Eastman is the authority on amines. OTTOMH, it is a base, so CS is probably okay. If a coating is desired, phenolics would probably NOT be a wise choice. Good Luck, Latexman Upvote 0 Downvote
Agree, Eastman is the authority on amines. OTTOMH, it is a base, so CS is probably okay. If a coating is desired, phenolics would probably NOT be a wise choice. Good Luck, Latexman