Based on my research, it is as below. (Note that it is for aerated condition as assumed and 10% of H2SO4)
1. SS 316 --> Not suitable as corrosion rate is more than 1 mm/year. (ref 1)
2. Hastelloy C-276 --> suitable as corrosion rate is below 0.13 mm/y (ref 2). There shall be proper wall thickness.
3. ALLOY 625--> suitable as corrosion rate is below 0.13 mm/y (ref 3). There shall be proper wall thickness.
4. Monel --> Not suitable. The option of Monel is only for the alternative to stainless steel when the corrosion rate of SS becomes high exposed to "deaerated condition".
(The corrosion rate exposed to "deaerated" or air-free is higher than aerated condition for SS. As SS has been already out of the option as No. 1 (from deaerated condition), the option of monel shall be out accordingly. ref 4
Ref 1 - Isocorrosion diagrams for (a) type 304, (b) type 316, and (c) type 317L stainless steels in aerated H2SO4 up to 50% concentration.
H. Abo, M. Ueda, and S. Noguchi, Boshoku Gijutso, Vol 23, 1974, p 341–346 (in Japanese)
Ref 2 - Isocorrosion diagram for alloy C-276 in H2SO4. The Corrosion Resistance of Nickel- Containing Alloys in Sulfuric Acid and Related Compounds,” Corrosion Engineering Bulletin 1, The International Nickel Company, 1983
Ref 3 - Isocorrosion diagram for alloy 625 in H2SO4, J.R. Crum and M.E. Adkins, Correlation of Alloy 625 Electrochemical Behavior with the Sulfuric Acid Isocorrosion Chart, Proc. NACE Corrosion/85 Symposium on Corrosion in Sulfuric Acid, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1985, p 23
Ref 4 - ASM Metals Handbook, Vol 13C Corrosion Environments and Industries, Corrosion by Sulfuric Acid / P663
Lee SiHyoung,
WorleyParsons Oman Engineering,