The reverse loads were discovered during a dynamic load test. A 120,000 pound continuous ripper miner had the cutter head plunge down onto a limestone rock measuring about 4ft x 6ft x 10ft so that the machine was bouncing off the ground. Strain guages had been attached to a 3.5" dia splined shafts (RH&LH drives) driving through CV joints. The strain guages were monitered via lead wires through slip rings at the outboard ends of the drum drives.
The measured stresses on the oscilloscope and print out verified calculated stresses. However, because MSHA (Mine Safety Health Administration)requires a max limit on inrush current of underground Coal machines during startup (an electric motor can develop 300% Full load current during start up), the LH motor had to have a 3 second time delay after the RH motor was energized.
The drum drive motors on this machine were located on the chassis with a long drive train of two drive shafts and several CV joints besides the CV joints connected to the notorious FAILING 4340 SPLINED SHAFTS. Inside of and upstream of the SHAFT was more drive train including a planetary, bevels etc.
This long drive train would wind up like a spring during start up on the RH side and by the time that the LH drive was energized, the RH side was UNWINDING and Powww! Reverse loading fatigue from START UP LOADS. Of course cutting loads added significantly to the fatigue history but the REVERSE loads were discovered during this dynamic testing which solved the mystery.
Maraging was a temporary solution -- the M shafts increased the fatigue life but still eventually failed because it was a geometry problem where the shaft had to pass thru the sun gear of the planetary to drive the center drum and later a second generation drum drive was designed to allow for a larger diameter splined shaft.
To reiterate and because cost is a factor for mechanodan's project, Maraging Steels are prohibitively expensive -- the shafts used to temp solve the above problem cost about $700 each -- no problem for Formula One folks.
Look at TVP's 17-4 suggestion!
Design for RELIABILITY, manufacturability, and maintainability