Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Low Bandwidth Application

Status
Not open for further replies.

GARL

Aerospace
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
10
Location
US
Hi everyone,

I am doing a trade study on replacing the wires on the sensor network for a wireless sensor network.

These sensors for example would measure pressure or temperature. I do not need a high-bandwidth standard. What do you recommend for my application.

So far I have done some research in Bluetooth, but it seems like its a high data rate transfer, and has a time slot of 625uS. Which is a lot faster than what I need.

Can this time slot be modified? I only need to send and receive once every 10 seconds or so. And my the amount of data I must send tops out at 3 Bytes. As from before these signals are only used to take readings from sensors.

Any input would be helpful. I was thinking of may be taking some of the standards and modifying it a little bit so I can get maximum battery life out.

Thanks!,

Garl
 
Look at ZigBee--I think Philips makes chips to do this standard. Bluetooth at a lower data rate would be OK. It has a constant envelope which means you can transmit at a level that will be near saturation making the modulation efficient. The demodulation is pretty simple if you can take a loss -- most BT receivers are limiter/discriminator types (with good analog filterws) or use a Delta-Sigma ADC-type front end (with relaxed analog filtering requirements since you can do it digitally).

Direct-sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) is another good choice. I would recommend a spreading gain of 16 dB or more and use BPSK or maybe pi/2 Differential BPSK.

The RF frequency is also important--you need to pick one that you are allowed to operate in (900 MHz, 2.4 GHz range) if you want to use unlicensed--typically lower is better.

Search Google to get some ideas.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top