SteveGregory
Structural
- Jul 18, 2006
- 554
I have a 5-story condo with reinforced CMU bearing walls and hollow-core plank floors. The bearing wall is 72' long, bays are 32' wide, floor-floor is 12'. IBC 2009 / ASCE 7-05
1. Can I use the entire length of the wall to figure At? If so, At=72(5x32)=11,520 sf. I used Kll=2. This allows for the maximum reduction down to L=0.4Lo. Or you could argue that the wall is a one-way slab and the width is limited to 1.5 x the floor-floor height. Then At=18(5x32)=2,880 sf. Now, L=0.448Lo. Your interpretation?
2. Even though I can't get a reduction of the snow load on the roof, I used the roof area as part of the tributary area being supported by the wall and footing. Does this make sense?
The strip footing load is getting very large. I think piles and a grade beam would not work for this project for budget reasons.
1. Can I use the entire length of the wall to figure At? If so, At=72(5x32)=11,520 sf. I used Kll=2. This allows for the maximum reduction down to L=0.4Lo. Or you could argue that the wall is a one-way slab and the width is limited to 1.5 x the floor-floor height. Then At=18(5x32)=2,880 sf. Now, L=0.448Lo. Your interpretation?
2. Even though I can't get a reduction of the snow load on the roof, I used the roof area as part of the tributary area being supported by the wall and footing. Does this make sense?
The strip footing load is getting very large. I think piles and a grade beam would not work for this project for budget reasons.