Ron levy:
BTH-1 has some discussion on Factors of Safety (FoS) and they go as high as 5 for parts which are used in the lifting process many times, over the years, such as shackles, slings, chains, etc. and on down to 2 or 2.5 for a permanent lifting lug on a piece of equipment, used only once for installation and once again for removal, and otherwise is in a protected environment. These types of components are often proof tested to 1.25 times their design load. Quality and clean detailing for load path, etc. and good welding so as not to introduce stress raisers are very important consideration in good design of these components. Keep in mind that welding on most aluminum components, as shown in your sketch, seriously reduces their strength, right where you need it most. It is most likely good that you don’t show a CJP welding, but rather fillets all around. Get copies of AWS welding codes for steel (D 1.1) and aluminum (D1.2) if you are going to be doing this kind of design work. You might be better off with a bolted lug detail, of some sort, which allows you to take full advantage of the tempered strength of the alum. Your detail again…, generally, you do not want to bring that thick a lug (pad eye pl.) down onto a very thin pl. on the lifted item, where you are depending upon pl. bending for load transfer. You want a more direct, cleaner load path, into a web or a stiffener of some sort, which distributes the load better. At the actual lifting pin hole, and because of the reduced mech. props. of the alum., you might want to bush a larger dia. hole in the alum. with a snug fitting steel bushing which has an i.d. to match an appropriate shackle. What kind of a part or machine/structure is this, that the lifting lug has to be made of aluminum?