Someone did not read the manual.
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations JAE on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
LAPD blast containment truck fails, seventeen people injured 6
- Thread starter jrs87
- Start date
-
1
- #102
TugboatEng
Marine/Ocean
Rocket scientists and cannoneers? Get these guys a defense contract. They have done the impossible by developing an improvised rocket device as well as a barrel-less cannon.
From the SFGate article said:
At least in this thread I think we came to the conclusion that there could only be one manufacturer of this particular model of blast chamber.
Even if we don't know the exact model and the data about how many times you can blast a certain amount before you need to scrape it seems to vary between different places.
It seems strange that the LAPD will not give out that information unless they are looking for a subcontractor for certain parts.
![[ponder]](/data/assets/smilies/ponder.gif "[ponder] [ponder]")
/A
“Logic will get you from A to Z; imagination will get you everywhere.“
Albert Einstein
"Bomb technicians estimated the weight of the explosives to be 16.5 pounds. without using a scale, Moore said. The vessel is designed to take, at most, 25 pounds for a single-use and 15 pounds for multiple uses. An investigation by The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives National Response Team found that the actual weight of the explosives was over 42 pounds."
LionelHutz
Electrical
My first thought was that it makes no sense to guess to the limit when they could take more time and do multiple explosions. My next thought was that this happened on the holiday weekend so they rushed it to get home. But, checking the date again it was a few days too early for that excuse.
At least we now know that there wasn't a problem with the containment vessel, there was just a problem with people using it! When you put a lot more explosives in the device that it was designed to contain it's bound to cause problems! I'm surprised that the device itself doesn't have some way of weighing the devices put inside of it but it probably will after this experience!
definately no one on the team had this mantra
“when you can measure what
you are speaking about, …
you know something about it;
but when you cannot measure it, …
your knowledge is of a meagre
and unsatisfactory kind…” Lord Kelvin 1883
But in their defense, taking a "bomb" apart so you can measure just the explosive would not be a job anyone would like
erring on the "safe" side should be a golden tule
“when you can measure what
you are speaking about, …
you know something about it;
but when you cannot measure it, …
your knowledge is of a meagre
and unsatisfactory kind…” Lord Kelvin 1883
But in their defense, taking a "bomb" apart so you can measure just the explosive would not be a job anyone would like
erring on the "safe" side should be a golden tule
I do wonder if confining the material made it worse.
How bad would it have been if they'd tossed the stuff in a Weber, doused it with kerosene, and tossed a match.
True, a populated area may not be the best place for such an experiment. But I'll also bet you could've sold tickets.
spsalso
How bad would it have been if they'd tossed the stuff in a Weber, doused it with kerosene, and tossed a match.
True, a populated area may not be the best place for such an experiment. But I'll also bet you could've sold tickets.
spsalso
TugboatEng
Marine/Ocean
Some explosives detonate by heat, others percussion. A fire is not a one size fits all solution here. I'm sure the counter charges are expensive. Department was probably trying to save money.
TugboatEng
Marine/Ocean
Unattended luggage from the airport.
It seems to me that a factor 2 is not adequate for such a catastrophic possibility. There's at least a 50% difference in detonation pressure amongst various explosives such as PETN and Semtex, so one would think that the safety margin would need to be more like 4x or higher, to account for explosive variability, errors in weighing, potential errors/defects in operation/construction.
I don't know how accurately the bomb squad can assess the actual explosive, i.e., 25 lb of PETN vs. 25 lb of Semtex
Also, there's literature on how the detonation velocity, which is dependent on detonation pressure, is a function of the amount/density of explosive seems to say there's at least around a factor of 2 in detonation pressure between various explosives.
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
I don't know how accurately the bomb squad can assess the actual explosive, i.e., 25 lb of PETN vs. 25 lb of Semtex
Also, there's literature on how the detonation velocity, which is dependent on detonation pressure, is a function of the amount/density of explosive seems to say there's at least around a factor of 2 in detonation pressure between various explosives.
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
That is something I have been thinking about what is the most "explosiv" material per gram is it TNT or Military C-4.
Both TNT and Military C-4 is used as a measurement of what the container can take.
But what is that the most explosive thing per gram that someone can be put tougher when making explosivs.
And even if they only X-rayed the cans and made a estimate, it hade been safer to assume it was the maximum amount that could be put in them, that where the weight.
In SE a soda can is 33 cl if you fill it up with flash powder 5 parts potassium nitrate, to 3 parts aluminum powder, to 2 parts sulfur
The potassium nitrate and sulfur aprox (2gram/cm3) = 46,2 gram aluminum powder aprox (1 g/cm3) = 9,9 grams.
The powder or can would weighed around 56,1 grams.
So there is some miscalculation on someone's part or maybe your soda cans are not 33 cl.
Or it wasn't potassium nitrate, aluminum powder, sulfur flash powder.
/A
“Logic will get you from A to Z; imagination will get you everywhere.“
Albert Einstein
Both TNT and Military C-4 is used as a measurement of what the container can take.
But what is that the most explosive thing per gram that someone can be put tougher when making explosivs.
And even if they only X-rayed the cans and made a estimate, it hade been safer to assume it was the maximum amount that could be put in them, that where the weight.
SFGate said:
In SE a soda can is 33 cl if you fill it up with flash powder 5 parts potassium nitrate, to 3 parts aluminum powder, to 2 parts sulfur
The potassium nitrate and sulfur aprox (2gram/cm3) = 46,2 gram aluminum powder aprox (1 g/cm3) = 9,9 grams.
The powder or can would weighed around 56,1 grams.
So there is some miscalculation on someone's part or maybe your soda cans are not 33 cl.
Or it wasn't potassium nitrate, aluminum powder, sulfur flash powder.
/A
“Logic will get you from A to Z; imagination will get you everywhere.“
Albert Einstein
I think the whole thing is run incorrectly. If you have a pile of things to blow up why would you not blow up a single one to take it's measure. Look at the pressure wave data generated and looking at some chart that pukes out TNT equivalence. Then there is zero explosive percentage estimation, zero weighing, and zero guessing of TNT equivalence. A small device would probably exclude the need for any kind of detailed inspection of the chamber post detonation.
That process would dump out, "You can depose of 12 devices at a time".
Keith Cress
kcress -
That process would dump out, "You can depose of 12 devices at a time".
Keith Cress
kcress -
Alistair_Heaton
Mechanical
to be honest even with my extreme low level knowledge of such things i can't understand why you would want to blow fireworks anyway.
They are mostly powder.
The easiest way of dealing with powder is to soak it with water which then kills the saltpeter and for ever more its useless. The biggest issue when I was involved in doing that was the waste water afterwards had to be disposed of because the water board didn't want such a huge amount of salty water screwing up the sewage system.
They are mostly powder.
The easiest way of dealing with powder is to soak it with water which then kills the saltpeter and for ever more its useless. The biggest issue when I was involved in doing that was the waste water afterwards had to be disposed of because the water board didn't want such a huge amount of salty water screwing up the sewage system.
Alistair_Heaton
Mechanical
yes but if the fireworks are useless there is no initiator for the HE which is pretty harmless then. You can throw it on a fire and it won't go bang. You can even eat it if you want.
- Status
Similar threads
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
