CNCLLC
Structural
- May 16, 2008
- 14
I have a two story moment frame that I am modeling and I do not agree with what the program is using for the Ky factor on the columns. The building has a rigid floor diaphragm and a flexible roof diaphragm and my program defaults are set to choose the K factors is the AISC nomographs.
If I were to pin the bases in the Y direction I am getting a Ky factor of 3.0 and my column sizes are being blown up. I understand how this is being calculated, but I do not agree with it, at least on the lower level, since the frame should be braced by the floor diaphragm.
If I were to fix the bases in the Y direction I am getting a Ky factor on the order of 2.0, which is more reasonable, however, there is no clear cut way of designing bi-axial base plates.
I would actually prefer to fix the base plates, so I was curious to know if anybody has a method of designing a bi-axial base plate that I can incorporate into a spread sheet, since there are quite a few load combinations. Otherwise, would it be reasonable to design as a pinned base and force a Ky into something less then 3.0.
Any opinion would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
If I were to pin the bases in the Y direction I am getting a Ky factor of 3.0 and my column sizes are being blown up. I understand how this is being calculated, but I do not agree with it, at least on the lower level, since the frame should be braced by the floor diaphragm.
If I were to fix the bases in the Y direction I am getting a Ky factor on the order of 2.0, which is more reasonable, however, there is no clear cut way of designing bi-axial base plates.
I would actually prefer to fix the base plates, so I was curious to know if anybody has a method of designing a bi-axial base plate that I can incorporate into a spread sheet, since there are quite a few load combinations. Otherwise, would it be reasonable to design as a pinned base and force a Ky into something less then 3.0.
Any opinion would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.