rddd
Structural
- Nov 2, 2014
- 1
Currently working in the Philippines constructing very small temporary timber shelters, after last year's super typhoon damaged or destroyed just over a million houses. The typical floor plan of these temporary shelters is 4m x 6m.
There is a guidance note produced locally which is provided to all agencies constructing these lightweight timber shelters. It outlines rules of thumb and simple techniques for 'building back safer' in this context.
Regarding lateral bracing for walls, the guidance note advises against knee bracing. It instead recommends cross bracing in both directions, from the top corners of the wall, to a 'strong point' at the floor beam/bottom plate connection in the centre position of the wall.
I'm interested to hear feedback on the advice given that knee bracing is inferior and/or ineffective in this case. Your advice will be much appreciated and help to expand this debate in-country. Many thanks in advance.
There is a guidance note produced locally which is provided to all agencies constructing these lightweight timber shelters. It outlines rules of thumb and simple techniques for 'building back safer' in this context.
Regarding lateral bracing for walls, the guidance note advises against knee bracing. It instead recommends cross bracing in both directions, from the top corners of the wall, to a 'strong point' at the floor beam/bottom plate connection in the centre position of the wall.
I'm interested to hear feedback on the advice given that knee bracing is inferior and/or ineffective in this case. Your advice will be much appreciated and help to expand this debate in-country. Many thanks in advance.
