fairgentlemanZ
Mechanical
- Jan 17, 2008
- 3
Does anyone have experience using tight clearances for a bore around 4"?
I'll try to keep this as simple as possible. The bearing is being used to axial locate tooling during machine operation. The tool needs to rotate for indexing.
Steel bearing, steel shaft. Shaft ~ 4", l/d ~ 1/2, the current diametric clearance is .00098" - .00208" . We would like to achieve less than .001" max. So yes an RC1 fit.
The tooling rotates inside the bearing at approximately 30 rpm (Velocity = ~ ~30 ft/m, .5 ft/s), and in indexing increments less than 180 degrees (so periods of less than 1 second). The operation is several starts/stops, no prolonged operation, low static friction needed.
The load is negligible, but for the sake of arguement lets throw an exagerated value of 500 lbs, P = ~62.5.
PV < 2,000.
Every text, "bearing design woorksheet", and example fit recommend diametric clearances of at least .001d and up (.0005d high lead), and for dry bearings .002d and up. So lets ignore conventional wisdom.
To reiterate, low speed, low load, tight tolerances for a large bore, low start torque. Open to all econimical material options. No ball bearings, we want our cake and eat it too.
Thanks,
Jeremy
I'll try to keep this as simple as possible. The bearing is being used to axial locate tooling during machine operation. The tool needs to rotate for indexing.
Steel bearing, steel shaft. Shaft ~ 4", l/d ~ 1/2, the current diametric clearance is .00098" - .00208" . We would like to achieve less than .001" max. So yes an RC1 fit.
The tooling rotates inside the bearing at approximately 30 rpm (Velocity = ~ ~30 ft/m, .5 ft/s), and in indexing increments less than 180 degrees (so periods of less than 1 second). The operation is several starts/stops, no prolonged operation, low static friction needed.
The load is negligible, but for the sake of arguement lets throw an exagerated value of 500 lbs, P = ~62.5.
PV < 2,000.
Every text, "bearing design woorksheet", and example fit recommend diametric clearances of at least .001d and up (.0005d high lead), and for dry bearings .002d and up. So lets ignore conventional wisdom.
To reiterate, low speed, low load, tight tolerances for a large bore, low start torque. Open to all econimical material options. No ball bearings, we want our cake and eat it too.
Thanks,
Jeremy