Smart = expensive
Expensive = company lawyers. Teams of them on retainer at all times and very eager to accrue some billable hours.
Nice idea but I stand by my earlier comment that any such success would be very quickly nipped in the bud.
It isn't in anyone's interests that employees should "own" their company email address nor have any legal rights over it.
On the other hand, it is quite possible that the email address constitutes a quasi-legal identity which is the employee entitled to use it and thus its continued use by a company could, in circumstances as suggested by RARSWC, could be argued to be actionable by the employee.
I'd guess we could have a pretty good stab at drawing up a "code of practice" for engineers.
It seems that a fair and logical interpretation should be that the company owns all email addresses that include the companies domain name but that is is for the use of the eponymous employee and represents him as a legal entity during his employment.
Thus:
[ul][li]joe.bloggs@major company.com is the quasi-legal identity of Joe Bloggs while he works for Major Company and Major Company owns the email provided for the official use by Joe Bloggs on company business but not to be used for any other business nor for private use.[/li]
[li]joe.bloggs@ MSN.com has no status in any way for Major Company and possibly not for any one specific Joe Bloggs[/li]
[li] info@major company.com etc. is the exclusive property of Major Company no matter which employess may use that email and whether on legitimate company business or not, it does not constitute any "rights" for the employee using it and nor may he use it in any way upon termination, not even to advise he is leaving nor even if it is the only email address that he has use off during his employment.[/li][/ul]
When Joe Bloggs leaves, he may email all currently active recipients, that is, recipients related to active projects, to advise he is leaving. This should be a recognised standard message unless otherwise agreed with the Major Company. He may not configure any auto responders nor otherwise take any other steps.
Major Company may leave the email account open for the express purpose of receiving incoming emails to which they may respond from another email address such as info@MajorCompany.com to advise that this email account is no longer active. Again standard message.
Joe Bloggs may not download his email address book except with the express consent of Major Company to any or all address, and ditto any correspondence. Joe Bloggs may not divert any mail from Joe.Bloggs at Major Company.com to any other non-authorised email account nor may he legally accessthis account once he has left the company.
Once the employee leaves the company, the company no longer has any right to issue emails using the employees name account address, nor create any new alternative name account addresses that use any variation of the employees name, but it may continue to receive emails expressly for the purpose of advising the sender of the changed status of the employee and that such emails might need to be responded to from a new email address.
It would seem that an semi-standard response ought not to evoke any "reading between the lines" and should fulfil the legitimate objectives of the employee and company.
JMW