I can think of no application where a pilot is required. Continuously lit pilots are a lazy, hazardous, unreliable, cheap but expensive (inital cost is low, operating cost is not, safety features are defeated by heat generated when repeated attempts to light off fail). My opinion does not count but in my opinion, pilots should not be used and should not be approved for use.
A pilot is hazardous and can result in an inappropriate light off. Pilots were popular previous to reliable spark ignitors for lighters ie. what you call torches.
For automatic lightoff please consider using.
1. A high energy spark ignitor (HEI) to light off a lighter (torch). Styles include auto retract, permanent insert, manual removal, and manual lightoff (see
for a good commercial grade lighter/ignitor/burner combination)Also see B&W, Cohen, Fireye, CE, GE, Fossil Power Systems
2. A lighter (torch) to light off the burner
Note: Design of the lighter and ignitor must comply with the appropriate ASME standard (Local, state, federal)for the fuel type, ambient temp, fuel flow, of the burner (and lighter) Basically, the lighter must provide adequate BTU to maintain combustion even if the burner fails to light. Likewise the sparker must maintain spark even if the lighter fails to light off. ie. safety first.
3. A flame scanning system is required during combustion to prove flame of the ignitor, lighter, and burner. To be of value and avoid fooling the operator, flame scanners must be able to discriminate between ignitor, lighter, and burner. Manual visual observation is one approved method of monitoring flames. Logic controls (x out of y flames lit) is another approved method of monitoring.
Due to the nature of your question, the complexity of the answer, the available options, and the potential for disastrous results possible from a minute mistake, please seek and obtain professional advise. The selected method of compliance must be approved and periodically monitored by the ASME approved state inspector.