walkersea
Mechanical
- Dec 12, 2005
- 22
Is a compressed fluid better at transferring heat?
As an example, a metal bottle container with a central internal heat source filled with air at atmospheric pressure. The heat source surface temperature increases (imagine it is a PSU that is generating heat as a by-product of electricity being passed through it). The air in the bottle is heated over time, and the bottle tube temperature is measured at some temperature higher than the ambient air outside the bottle.
If dry compressed air (or nitrogen?) was used to raise the internal pressure in the bottle to say 50psi (3.5bar), the bottle sealed and then the heat source activated, would the time taken for the tube to reach the same temperature as previously be reduced - i.e. is the compressed air better at transferring the heat?
Thanks.
As an example, a metal bottle container with a central internal heat source filled with air at atmospheric pressure. The heat source surface temperature increases (imagine it is a PSU that is generating heat as a by-product of electricity being passed through it). The air in the bottle is heated over time, and the bottle tube temperature is measured at some temperature higher than the ambient air outside the bottle.
If dry compressed air (or nitrogen?) was used to raise the internal pressure in the bottle to say 50psi (3.5bar), the bottle sealed and then the heat source activated, would the time taken for the tube to reach the same temperature as previously be reduced - i.e. is the compressed air better at transferring the heat?
Thanks.