bth1
Chemical
- Jul 22, 2005
- 8
I am currently sizing the blowdown orifices and associated inlet/outlet piping for an offshore oil separation process.
For sizing of the orifices I am using HYSYS's depressurisation utility.
For critical flow, HYSYS estimates the orifice size using the orifice equation stated in Perry's (Pg 10-15):
w = Cd.A.P1.(k.(M/(R*T1)).((2/(k+1))^((k+1)/(k-1))))^0.5
This equation is derived based on the assumption that the beta ratio (orifice diameter / upstream pipe diameter) is < 0.2. When the beta ratio is < 0.2, i.e. the orifice diameter is small in comparison to the upstream pipe diameter, frictional effects can be ignored.
For the inlet piping upstream of a blowdown orifice, I normally size based on a rho.v2 criteria and ensure that the velocity and pressure drop are sensible.
I am concerned that this is not sufficient though. For example, using the above criteria, I may end up with a 4" pipe for the maximum mass flowrate predicted. However, for the orifice size calculated by HYSYS, a 4" pipe may mean that my beta ratio is a lot higher than 0.2. This in turn means that frictional effects become a factor and in reality my orifice may not actually pass as much mass as HYSYS has predicted, thus the time to blowdown increases.
I would welcome any thoughts on the above and would also be interested on how you typically size the inlet lines upstream of blowdown orifices.
For sizing of the orifices I am using HYSYS's depressurisation utility.
For critical flow, HYSYS estimates the orifice size using the orifice equation stated in Perry's (Pg 10-15):
w = Cd.A.P1.(k.(M/(R*T1)).((2/(k+1))^((k+1)/(k-1))))^0.5
This equation is derived based on the assumption that the beta ratio (orifice diameter / upstream pipe diameter) is < 0.2. When the beta ratio is < 0.2, i.e. the orifice diameter is small in comparison to the upstream pipe diameter, frictional effects can be ignored.
For the inlet piping upstream of a blowdown orifice, I normally size based on a rho.v2 criteria and ensure that the velocity and pressure drop are sensible.
I am concerned that this is not sufficient though. For example, using the above criteria, I may end up with a 4" pipe for the maximum mass flowrate predicted. However, for the orifice size calculated by HYSYS, a 4" pipe may mean that my beta ratio is a lot higher than 0.2. This in turn means that frictional effects become a factor and in reality my orifice may not actually pass as much mass as HYSYS has predicted, thus the time to blowdown increases.
I would welcome any thoughts on the above and would also be interested on how you typically size the inlet lines upstream of blowdown orifices.