Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

inboard ratios help

Status
Not open for further replies.

jayz395

Automotive
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
7
Location
GB
hi im building new race car and gonna try and put in board suspension on the front. my question is why use ratios like 2:1 and not just 1:1. secondly if i normally use a 250 spring and using a 2:1 ratio do i divide the spring by 2 which would make it a 125 spring?
 
You may use 1:1 ratio, or any suitable ratio for a good istallation. A 1:1 ratio makes the coilover travel a longer distance than if you use an Mr of 0,5 as the coilover travel only 1/2 the distance which put higer demand for the shock to control the wheel movement regarding play etc. But it allowes for a tighter installation.

However, the spring required is Mr^2, and the reason is that it concern the change in N per mm, and not the lever ratio only.

Regards
Goran Malmberg
 
ok if i choose a 2:1 ratio, the wheel comes up an 1 inch while the shock goes down 2 inch?? how do i work out wot spring i would need? sorry but im new to this.i normally use a 250 spring but thats on outboard suspension. ive ordered chassis Design - Principles and Analysis by Milliken and Milliken is this book anygood?
 
To maintain the same rate at the wheel "wheel rate", if you go from a MR of 1 to a MR of 2 you will need to divide the original spring rate by 4 to get the same wheel rate.
ie the wheel rate is the spring rate/MR^2

So a 250lb spring @1:1 means you need a 62.5lb spring @2:1
 
EDIT*
Sorry,

just had the formula around the wrong way for the convention you used for motion ratio. In that case wheel rate=spring rate x MR^2.

Spring rate still needs to be 1/4 of original.

 
tell me if im being think but under stand to divide by 4, but say i used 1:6 or that i dont really understand the calcuation.

wheel rate=spring rate x MR^2.
250*2.1 ?????????
 
I think an old Greek guy called Archimedes might argue strongly for 1:2 mechanical advantage = 2:1 change in load and 1:2 change in distance. It is a simple lever for crying out loud.

Regards

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
 
Probably off-topic, but possibly relevant - about a year ago Hot Rod Magazine had a paragraph in one of their issues about this site.


Norm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top