Go figure. Interesting. A couple possible reasons that came to my mind for improved efficiency were, 1) more air for a given amount of fuel means cp/cv of the mix gets higher and closer to that of just air, and 2) lower starting temps mean lower temps throughout the cycle, which would reduce heat loss. But I wouldn't think a drop of 10C would make a big difference in those couple things.
There is a graph in Heywood, (Fig. 15-24), which shows improvements in efficiency with AFR. Going from, say, 27C to 17C would mean a mass-flow rate improvement of about 1.7%, (sqrt[300/290] - 1), so for a given fuel-flow rate, AFR would go up by that percentage. From that graph in Heywood, doesn't look like that would be a significant change at all.
But maybe there are some other reasons for it? Look forward to seeing the data.