Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

IBC 2000 1605.3.1.1

Status
Not open for further replies.

mrengineer

Structural
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
157
Location
US
Supposedly this section gives you a break by allowing two or more transient loads to be multiplied by .75. However, the combined load cannot be less than D+E, without the .7 factor applied to E. This creates a new load combination that is more conservative than any of the combinations in Formulas 16-7 thru 16-12. Therefore, by trying to take advantage of their 'break', I have actually hurt myself by having to use this new load combination. Am I missing something?
 
For allowable combinations I think it means:

To use D+0.75x(E+ (other transient loads)).

DO NOT use D+0.75x(0.7E + (other transient loads)).

(D+0.7E) must also be checked, and (0.6D+0.7E).

Not D+E.
 
Thank you Haynewp. What you say makes sense. I think that considering how much these equations are used, it would be better if the Code wrote out all of the various combinations rather than turning it into a riddle.
 
mrengineer-
You've hit on a subject that I've long pondered....how the code is written in language rather than a logical flow chart diagram or other some sort of graphical mechanism whereby a strict logical process can be followed.

Instead, there are numerous paragraphs and words that seem to imply concepts, but require lots of interpretation. Overall, I think the code writing dudes have done a magnificent job of keeping it to a point just this side of sanity....

Are they toying with us? [ponder]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top