KernOily
Petroleum
- Jan 29, 2002
- 711
Good morning. Here's a dumb mech engr question for you fine fellers.
Suppose I have the following compositional analysis of a gas. This was sampled at a compressor discharge. This is an ASTM-whatever-method dry gas analysis, done in a lab, at STP:
[CO2] = 0.4
[C1] = 0.4
[C2] = 0.02
[H2S] = 0.002
[C6+] remainder
Now suppose I am simulating a process that uses this gas with my trusty process simulator. Problem is, this gas exists in the process in a water-saturated form. So the gas is not in fact dry at all but is water-saturated. In real life the process runs at 190° F and 0.1 psig, according to my infallible field PIs and TIs ;-).
To properly do the simulation of the whole process, then, I need to know what mole fraction water (vapor) will exist in equilibrium with this particular 'dry gas' mixture. So to saturate the gas, at the front end of the process, I made my simulator to feed this dry gas stream at 190°, along with a liquid water stream also at 0.1. psig and 190°, into a 'mixer' and then on to a fake separator to do the flash and to determine the water vapor fraction. As long as I have liquid water coming off the bottom of the fake separator, I know I have an equilibrium saturated gas. The overheads off this fake separator is then the saturated 'real gas' that will be used to model the real process. The real process, then, actually starts just downstream of this 'saturation module'.
Problem is, when I do this, the predicted temperature of the now-saturated gas from the overheads of the fake separator is nowhere near the 190° that I need, that the real life TI says, but it's like 176° or so. I need the real 190 for my HEX calcs. No matter what I do in the way of adjustments to the front of the model, I can't get the water-saturated gas to exist at 190 and 0.1. psig.
So I am thinking I am forgetting something fundamental here. I need to hear from you experts on phase equilibrium. I am thinking that at 0.1 psig, this particular saturated gas mixture can't exist at 190° F. The 'dry gas' can exist at anything I want, but add the water and it's no more than 176 or so due to the species present and the physics of the k-values. Yes? Art - I bet you know the answer. Thanks!!! Pete
PS - I think this points up two issues (1) I have forgotten the fundamentals and am relying on a simulator to do my work - Not Good (2) it's not possible to get real life to match a process imulator, and I would do well to remember that. Your comments? What was it John Campbell said - "Knowledge of the fundamentals is the required foundation for successful professional practice" - or some such.
Thanks!
Pete
Suppose I have the following compositional analysis of a gas. This was sampled at a compressor discharge. This is an ASTM-whatever-method dry gas analysis, done in a lab, at STP:
[CO2] = 0.4
[C1] = 0.4
[C2] = 0.02
[H2S] = 0.002
[C6+] remainder
Now suppose I am simulating a process that uses this gas with my trusty process simulator. Problem is, this gas exists in the process in a water-saturated form. So the gas is not in fact dry at all but is water-saturated. In real life the process runs at 190° F and 0.1 psig, according to my infallible field PIs and TIs ;-).
To properly do the simulation of the whole process, then, I need to know what mole fraction water (vapor) will exist in equilibrium with this particular 'dry gas' mixture. So to saturate the gas, at the front end of the process, I made my simulator to feed this dry gas stream at 190°, along with a liquid water stream also at 0.1. psig and 190°, into a 'mixer' and then on to a fake separator to do the flash and to determine the water vapor fraction. As long as I have liquid water coming off the bottom of the fake separator, I know I have an equilibrium saturated gas. The overheads off this fake separator is then the saturated 'real gas' that will be used to model the real process. The real process, then, actually starts just downstream of this 'saturation module'.
Problem is, when I do this, the predicted temperature of the now-saturated gas from the overheads of the fake separator is nowhere near the 190° that I need, that the real life TI says, but it's like 176° or so. I need the real 190 for my HEX calcs. No matter what I do in the way of adjustments to the front of the model, I can't get the water-saturated gas to exist at 190 and 0.1. psig.
So I am thinking I am forgetting something fundamental here. I need to hear from you experts on phase equilibrium. I am thinking that at 0.1 psig, this particular saturated gas mixture can't exist at 190° F. The 'dry gas' can exist at anything I want, but add the water and it's no more than 176 or so due to the species present and the physics of the k-values. Yes? Art - I bet you know the answer. Thanks!!! Pete
PS - I think this points up two issues (1) I have forgotten the fundamentals and am relying on a simulator to do my work - Not Good (2) it's not possible to get real life to match a process imulator, and I would do well to remember that. Your comments? What was it John Campbell said - "Knowledge of the fundamentals is the required foundation for successful professional practice" - or some such.
Thanks!
Pete