If it OOTB, at the bottom of the screen is an About WIndchill tag that will display version and build information.
Windchill is base technology, only a big toolkit. PDMlink and Intralink are applications built on the Windchill framework. Intralink in this case is 8.0 and higher, not the simplier 3.x version.
If your company implemented Windchill as a means of saving your engineers time, the person that did the selling should be sued or fired. Any complex data management system will not save you time directly from the engineering side. It does provide benefits to the company as a whole, if fully implemented and tuned. Tuning is more than just software settings. Is your hardware prefroming fast enough for the load of your use community?
At my last admin job, we had a dual processor Xeon with 4GB of memory as the Windchill server with 30-40 users. Had to reboot twice a day to keep the method servers from choking themselves to death. Upgradeed to a dual quad-core with 16GB memory and my reboots went down and performance went up. Still rebooted every night, but that deals with Wintel machines in general since their memory management is terrible.
If you implemented PDMLink, are you using it to its fullest or should you have implemented Intralink instead? Intralink does CAD vaulting and release cycles, just like 3.4 did. PDMLink does full change management from initial problem report to change notification with CAD vaulting a part in the middle.
"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."
Ben Loosli