Hello SA,
Thanks for your answers, I also heard something like that.
"Users complained they could not see the graphics area when the dialog box was opened", that is also what I heard as the reason to implement the propertymanager. I never found this a problem, once you changed a dialog menu to a preferred location it stayed there. Only for some commands the dialog boxes were hiding geometry.
But now this problem has been replaced by another. Now with the property manager users cannot see their commands instead
of the geometry with the dialog boxes with multiple
windows open. Which is worse?
I think the real solution should have been that the dialog boxes should have been more intuitive and much smaller so
they didn't hide the geometry. Just like the mate popup menu.
One example, to ad a prefix or add text to a dimension text, you have to move into the tree and go back. This causes me an enormous amount of unnecessairy mousemovements a day and even minor RSI problems.
What it should have been, something like shift+double click
or another shortkey that would immediately get you in a popup
text editer.
This is what I have done the last days, I don't need to go
in the tree anymore to change the dimensiontext. It just pops
up the old dialog box text editer on the right place and
I can immediately type, no need to move a mouse.
Shift+double click=edit dimension text in old dialog menu
Alt+double click=exit dimension text in old dialog menu
Double click=change dimension, of course standard solidworks.
I guess that if in SW2008 you would have to go into the tree
to change a dimensionvalue everybody would complain. It is
just inefficient to go into a property manager while there are
so many ways to avoid this.
This is just a logic way of avoiding mousemovement.
It will save me several hundreds move to the tree a day.
I am not finished yet, I think I can save thousands of mousemoves to the tree and regain some productivity loss because of the propertymanagers. However, it shouldn't
be necessairy, Solidworks should have invented better
ways instead of the propertymangagers for almost everything.
I guess it is a lot easier for programmers to add everything
in propertymangers, but I find it is getting more and more an onscreen database instead of an efficient userinterface. Especially when working with many windows open at the same time, propertymanagers are a real waste of mouseclicks and
mousemovements, scrollwork etc.
I like Solidworks as a CAD modeller, it's only that I am not happy with the userinterface, gradually Solidworks has
become an extreme mousemovement intensive program.
Of course there are programs that are even worse.
Solidworks was the first windows CAD developper that
made things much easier, but this is something that is so obvious for me that I wonder why they couldn't have done this part of the userinterface better.
Richard