Nadim,
I think you are under the impression that FEM = composite analysis. FEM is only a tool that can assist you with analysis and in general it can help to enhance your accuracy, etc. For those getting started, the pretty pictures are way to attract customers, but it may be misleading as well.
But at the core of it, FEM is not really "analysis" by itself. A "detail analysis" means that you would extract the load from the FEM and then apply that to a structural detail, such a hole, joint, etc. Will you need to consider this for the hull? Will you need to consider the effects of impact damage?
For example, let us consider a hole. You may not actually model the hole in the FEM. Instead, you would look at the loads in that region and then apply this to a detail model capable of considering the local stress field around the hole. Even if you were to model the hole in the FEM, it will only be mildly helpful if you don't know how to apply a failure criteria for it, with the material system you are working on. Similarly, there are special failure modes to consider when going around bends, etc. that the FEM will not be able to directly solve for you.
Without knowledge of structural analysis, an advanced FEM software is not likely to give the desired result of "enhanced accuracy", which is the major objective. That being said, you could perhaps find a strain allowable based on a technical paper. You could then apply this globally to the FEM and make sure your structure is capable of the applied loads. But in my opinion, there is no need for special composite software solutions if you are going to do that.
Brian