There was a period of time during my early career when I worked for a person whom many considered a bit of a tyrant. He came from a somewhat poor background (his mother was full-blooded Native American) and prior to attending engineering school (which he did on the GI Bill) he had been a merchant seaman and yes, he swore like a sailor. He also tended to play favorites, but in this case, that worked to my advantage. You see, there was a clique in our office. There were five engineers, including myself, who had over the years all graduated from the same engineering school as had the Director of Engineering (the person whom I'm commenting about).
Now as for the good and bad aspects of working, in my situation, being a 'member' of the clique it meant that I often did get better treatment like being given the opportunity for specialized training in new technologies (like being part of the first group sent to learn the CAD/CAM software), attending trade shows, being invited for dinner when a big customer was in town, etc. And of course, part of his reputation was that he tended to ignore those who were not part of the clique. Also he tended to question peoples abilities, often in front of their peers, sometimes along with an appropriate expletive or two. Now don't get me wrong, I had been on the receiving end of these situations, just that I was willing to let it pass since I knew that eventually I would get some sort of 'perk' to make-up for it. But it also meant that we (clique members) often got what other people considered as really rotten assignments, like getting a phone call early on a Saturday morning telling you to get to the airport as there was a ticket waiting for a flight to some industrial paradise like Cleveland, OH or Oakland, CA or Kingston, ONT where some customer was complaining about some piece of equipment that we sold them and they had been promised that someone would be there to 'fix' the problem ASAP. Now it turned out that these 'assignments' were not punishment but rather because our boss trusted up to get the job done. He just assumed that we could do the job and he trusted us to do it no matter what. Of course, we eventually got rewarded, either by getting one of those 'perks' I previously mentioned or even an extra bit when the annual merit raises were handed out or even a promotion when something opened-up.
So I guess the lesson is that there is always good and bad in any job, and even when it may look like the bad is the result of some unfair or unjust situation, it really does depend on where and how you fit in and what its real impact is on you.
Now as for a postscript, the boss that I was taking about was eventually 'fired', but while the official story was that (and it was something that was hard to dispute) he had not treated his subordinates with respect and fairness, the real back-story was that he had had a long-term running feud with upper executives and due to some really odd circumstances, he was very well liked by our UK-based owners and the local executives were afraid that he might blow the whistle on them for some poor decision that they had made that cost the company a lot of money unnecessarily but which had not yet become apparent to those UK-based owners. When I got the opportunity to make a career change a few months later, it was an easier decision to make since I had actually liked my old boss, flaws and all, and felt that he was screwed out of his job in the end, views which I expressed when I had my exit interview.
John R. Baker, P.E. (ret)
EX-Product 'Evangelist'
Irvine, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:
The secret of life is not finding someone to live with
It's finding someone you can't live without