ElCidCampeador
Mechanical
- May 14, 2015
- 274
Hi,
I have an ellipsoidal head (Mat. SA 516 GR.70, D.I.1000 Thk.60mm) that has to be welded to a pressure vessel designed acc.to ASME VIII Div.1.
The vessel is impact tested acc. to UCS 66.
The supplier of head will hot press @ 920°C the head without PFHT of normalization.
Acc. to ASME I need to do a welding test coupon and have PQR with impact test.
Do you think it's necessary a PFHT of normalization for the head? (N.B: Vessel will take PWHT per ASME later, but I know that PWHT and PFHT are not the same)
Vessel is impact tested, the fact that normalization could change curves in figure UCS-66 doesn't change the mandatory request of a test coupon (which is required in any case), so why doing a PFHT which will increase costs?
This is my idea, I wait your opinions. Thanks.
I have an ellipsoidal head (Mat. SA 516 GR.70, D.I.1000 Thk.60mm) that has to be welded to a pressure vessel designed acc.to ASME VIII Div.1.
The vessel is impact tested acc. to UCS 66.
The supplier of head will hot press @ 920°C the head without PFHT of normalization.
Acc. to ASME I need to do a welding test coupon and have PQR with impact test.
Do you think it's necessary a PFHT of normalization for the head? (N.B: Vessel will take PWHT per ASME later, but I know that PWHT and PFHT are not the same)
Vessel is impact tested, the fact that normalization could change curves in figure UCS-66 doesn't change the mandatory request of a test coupon (which is required in any case), so why doing a PFHT which will increase costs?
This is my idea, I wait your opinions. Thanks.