Before the 1960's there were two "wild cards" that required the
design compressive strength to be set relatively low:
1. Until after World War II, ready-mix concrete was not commonly available - except in cities. Variable quality local aggregate was used, and a Contractor's on-site concrete mixer was "charged" with measurement by volume (e.g. 1 wheelbarrow cement, 2 wheelbarrows fine aggregate, and 4 wheelbarrows coarse aggregate... add water - by experience, mix, and place.)
2. Before concrete strength design was formally introduced by ACI in 1963, the safe working stress was arbitrary set low. In 1940 the value was 45% of the (laboratory) 28-day compressive strength. This was to compensate for variations in field-mixed concrete.
From first-hand experience, in the 1970's we refurbished and widened, highway bridges that were constructed in rural locations in the 1930's. That 1930's concrete was every bit as good, or better, than modern 4000 psi concrete. The earlier methods were crude, but workmanship and attention to details (accurate charging of the mixer, vibration, curing, etc.) were superior.
IMHO, if the
design strength of a pre-1960 structure is known, test samples from the existing structure. The actual concrete strength is likely much higher than the design strength.
For structures from before 1930, testing samples is more important - quality of cement was a variable also.
![[r2d2] [r2d2] [r2d2]](/data/assets/smilies/r2d2.gif)