Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

HEC-RAS ENCROACHMENT

Status
Not open for further replies.

mhiw

Civil/Environmental
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
3
Location
US
Using HEC-RAS method 4 to determine encroachments for floodway definition, seting target ws elev as shown in Application Guide, Example 6. But response seems backwards: increasing target elev results in smaller topwidth (as expected) but lower ws. Decreasing target elev results in larger topwidth but higher ws.

I can see that as encroachment increases, main channel n value (lower than overbank n) starts to dominate, overcoming reduced area for greater flow and lower elevation. But I don't see where to go from here. WS elev response seems to be from d/s x-sects, rather than x-sect of interest.
 
That is true. In order to get the WSE at the section of interest to match the tolerance desired (1 foot higher than 100-year WSE for most states, but only 0.2 feet higher for NJ), you do have to move the encroachments outward on the downstream sections. I pulled my hair out on this too, but it takes time to smooth the encroachments out and get the best difference for each section. Just keep at it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top