I can only communicate our customers experience on this. They never had any problems with these heat exchangers. I am led to believe that the increased heat transfer resistance due to the coating is negligible as it is applied in a very thin layer. As I said in my last post above, they (the customer in question) never had problems with these hx, when we moved in to revamp the plant, they initially asked to apply the saekaphen also to the new hx we needed. Later they modified this (also because the difference in cost has become minimal) to duplex steel, mainly due to the fact that the new exchangers had untreated water on both sides, shell and tube, which would have made the coating even a little more expensive than the duplex version.
The use of saekaphen was widely done in the nineties, but most customers by now - as I mentioned above - require duplex steels. I can't give you a definitive suggestion on this. If the requirement for coating is only on tube side, you might save a little money. My recommendation would be to ask your preferred manufacturer for their opinion and prices.
hth,
chris