I would test this long and hard before committing to production.
“Teflon®-impregnated hard anodize” is basically a myth. The pores are too small even for the submicron particles used, and there is a surface charge problem. Ergo, MIL-A-63576A ALUMINUM OXIDE COATING, LUBRICATIVE, FOR ALUMINUM AND ALUMINUM ALLOYS was canceled without replacement in 1998.
For those anodizers who claim to co-deposit Teflon® during the anodizing process, this is basically not true, either. See
A. D. Dinsmore et al., Nature, vol. 383, p. 239 (1996), or
J. M. Runge and A. Pomis, Plating & Surface Finishing, p. 60-64 (June 2003).
The latter paper describes experimental work in which an unspecified ‘electroactive polymer’ was co-deposited with hard anodize. This process has not yet been commercialized to my knowledge.
Alternatives: liquid or dry-film lubricants such as baked-on Teflon® can be used on unsealed hard anodize. Or, electroless nickel containing co-deposits such as Teflon® particles can be plated on aluminum.