Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JStephen on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Grain Size Distribution and Soil Classification

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sebast_U_1973

Civil/Environmental
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
8
Location
US
D60 - D10 are common parameters to work with from a Grain Size Distribution.
I am on a project which specifies a D80-D30 classification of the particle size.

What use would the D80-D30 have over the D60-D10 ?

Or has anyone come across this grain size distribution before ?

The project involves an Athletic field.

Thanks in advance for input.
 
Material grain size specifications are commonly specified as multiple screen sizes and a range in acceptable percent passing to create a grain size envelope with upper an lower bounds. Not sure what your comment is truly stating regarding the D80-D30, is this the only specification for the material you can show up with a boulder and a lump of clay and hit any specification by adjusting the amount of clay to mix with boulders.
 
Thank you for the input and feedback. Yes I was not completely sure how to word my concern. Usually Sieve Analysis and material gradations reference the D60 particle size and the D10 partical size in order to obtain the Cu (Coefficient of uniformity) and also the D30 is used in a formula for the Cc (Coefficient of curvature). So I was surprised to see a specification referencing the D80, which in general would be more smaller particles. (Comparing the same soil sample). Therefore my question is what soil properties would this fraction of smaller particle sizes effect. Given a soil description of Silty Sand (USCS designation of SM). Would more smaller particle sizes effect the shrikage factor, I believe it would, aside from this property or behavior, this writer was searching for more definitive reasoning or output.

Again any and all input is appreciated and look forward to summarizing a better conclusion on why this particular specification has referenced the particle size (D80). Thank you for your time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top