I think that the best explanation/discussion that I have seen in texts available is given in Terzaghi & Peck's (with Mesri) book (1995). Normally, most have used D10 size (and Hazan's coefficient - although that was for uniform sized medium sand). Kenney's work at UofT suggests, if I remember right, that the D5 size might be a better fit for correlation. Of course, there are theoretical formulas as well. One item to keep in mind is the nature of your material. I have seen water ponding for three days on a crushed stone base course that was compacted to 100% modified Proctor MDD - yet, less than 8% was passing the #200 sieve. Rounded grains will have higher permeability than angular grains. But, suggest you start your look-see with TP&M. Cheers