Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Grain Size and Permeability

Status
Not open for further replies.

DirtPlayer

Geotechnical
Jun 11, 2007
3
Anybody know better correlations between graine size distributions and coefficients of permeability?

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I think that the best explanation/discussion that I have seen in texts available is given in Terzaghi & Peck's (with Mesri) book (1995). Normally, most have used D10 size (and Hazan's coefficient - although that was for uniform sized medium sand). Kenney's work at UofT suggests, if I remember right, that the D5 size might be a better fit for correlation. Of course, there are theoretical formulas as well. One item to keep in mind is the nature of your material. I have seen water ponding for three days on a crushed stone base course that was compacted to 100% modified Proctor MDD - yet, less than 8% was passing the #200 sieve. Rounded grains will have higher permeability than angular grains. But, suggest you start your look-see with TP&M. Cheers
 
There is a design method which uses the Karman-Kozeny equation to estimate permeability of granular soil based on the gradation, estimate of void ratio, and grain angularity. It was discussed in a paper in the ASCE Geotech. Journal a few years back and it estimated permeability much closer than the old Hazen formula. The paper provides guidelines for void ratio based on soil classification and relative density. I have it programmed into an excel gradation spreadsheet and it is also a good way to look at sensitivity with void ratio.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor