BearcatEngineer:
I was just questioning your comment that you think the geotechnical engineering doesn't have your "best interest (cost)" at heart. What I was implying is that a good geotechnical engineer will always have the "
project's best interest" at heart when he carries out his investigation, provides his recommendations, and follows up with you. If he doesn't, as jdonville says, you've got the wrong geotechnical engineer.
I always like when my clients have an understanding of geotechnical engineering - I am not say "being" a geotechnical engineer, but having a grounded base on what the art is about. I have had clients who know a few buzz words and when in meetings with their uppers, when I am trying to explain a complex situation, they interject and throw about an explanation that is spurious at best. They don't have a clue (don't know squat) about preconsolidation pressures, porewater coefficients, nuances of undrained shear strength - they make a mess of things thinking that geotechnical engineering is simplistic and, sadly, convince their uppers they are right.
I think that it is great you want to develop that grass roots basis. I would suggest that you get a copy of Tschebotarioff and glance through it; or Peck Hanson and Thornburn. I also suggest that you might be find an "on-line" lecture series on geotechnical engineering by Prof John Atkinson at the University of West of England (
) of interest. This is a very good basic series and takes you through all the basics from soil mechanics to foundations to retaining walls
etc.
Good luck with your pursuit. I have done this exercise myself for highways design, etc. when I find things don't seem as they should (
e.g. specifying heavy riprap slopes in areas where normal turfing would be more than adequate.)
![[cheers] [cheers] [cheers]](/data/assets/smilies/cheers.gif)