Hi Scotty;
You are correct, except that I would expect the real power overload on this combination to be near or over the capability of the gen set. I have a customer who regularly starts a motor of about 80HP. on a 275kW set. This is a 3550 RPM motor with a relatively high starting current ratio. The motor starts but the lights dim and the gen-set leans into the motor mounts and blows black smoke until the turbo spools up.
Note, the lights dim a little when the motor is started on the grid also.
A naturally aspirated engine would handle the block loading a little better.
I have had other experiences with gen sets where the protection had to be "softened up" before large motors could be started.
It is not just the real power and the reactive power. It is also natural aspiration versus turbos, AVRs and some voltage collapse versus PMG excitation, gen set rotational inertia, governor response to block loading, and protection settings.
On this size of set, I would expect a droop governor with 3% proportional band. No integral or derivative. The electronic governors that I have seen have similar performance to the mechanical governors but I haven't seen a wide enough variety of electronic governors to be an expert on them.
Running an electronic governed set in parallel with a mechanically governed set worked quite well when the mechanical set was warmed up. When the sets were cold at first start in the morning, we couldn't get the large motors online due to governor lag on the mechanically governed set. After 5 or 10 minutes of warm-up, both the electronic governor and the mechanical tracked well together and shared the load well. The lag of a cold governor would be an additional factor adding to speed and voltage drop (UFRO).
Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter