shukrhk
Mechanical
- Mar 10, 2015
- 2
I work with an oil company and we face a particular problem during some turnarounds.
The problem occurs in hydrotesting some lines before we put the plant back to service.
and to be more specific, the isolation points of the line that will be hydrotested are ring type joints (RTJs)
and to isolate them, we use a fabricated blanking spade made out of carbon steel and we often hydrotest up to 3500 psi.
but, here is the issue:
*there is a limit to how much we can pull the two flanges apart to insert the blanking spade. Because of that we are unable to insert an RTJ blanking spade. so we use a flat blanking spade with a sheet gasket.
*the sheet gasket often cannot hold the pressure, so we have to repeat the test many times until it holds up and that often introduces some delays.
our technical support unit suggested that we start fabricating the spades from a different material (ASTM A579 Grade-73) which is supposed to allow for thinner spades and thus allows more room for an RTJs spades.
so my questions are:
1- what are your thoughts about using that different material (ASTM A579 Grade-73)
2- are there any suggestions on another gasket type that can be used just for hydrotests to seal a joint that has an RTJ flange on one side and a flat face or race face on the other.
thanks
The problem occurs in hydrotesting some lines before we put the plant back to service.
and to be more specific, the isolation points of the line that will be hydrotested are ring type joints (RTJs)
and to isolate them, we use a fabricated blanking spade made out of carbon steel and we often hydrotest up to 3500 psi.
but, here is the issue:
*there is a limit to how much we can pull the two flanges apart to insert the blanking spade. Because of that we are unable to insert an RTJ blanking spade. so we use a flat blanking spade with a sheet gasket.
*the sheet gasket often cannot hold the pressure, so we have to repeat the test many times until it holds up and that often introduces some delays.
our technical support unit suggested that we start fabricating the spades from a different material (ASTM A579 Grade-73) which is supposed to allow for thinner spades and thus allows more room for an RTJs spades.
so my questions are:
1- what are your thoughts about using that different material (ASTM A579 Grade-73)
2- are there any suggestions on another gasket type that can be used just for hydrotests to seal a joint that has an RTJ flange on one side and a flat face or race face on the other.
thanks