printing724
Electrical
- Oct 26, 2006
- 17
Re exposure levels: electricpete's conversion is right on, 8217 microsievierts/hr is 822 mrem/hr.
(Disclaimer: what follows is from my Navy career which ended many years ago. I believe it to still be current)
To put that in perspective, the occupational limit in the US nuclear industry is 3,000 mrem (30,000 microsieverts) per quarter or 5,000 mrem (50,000 microsieverts) per year. This is based on a presumed "safe" level that does not add substantially to long-term cancer risks.
The Navy's limits when I was in were 300 mrem (3000 microsieverts) per quarter or 500 mrem (5000 microsieverts) per year.
Acute physical damage starts to occur at short-term exposure levels in the 50-100 rem (500,000-1,000,000 microsieverts) range. If the exposure level rises to 300-500 rem (3,000,000-5,000,000 microsieverts) the short-term survival odds drop to 50% or less..
At Fukushima, they reported a spike to 822 mrem (8217 microsieverts) at the perimeter, then decreasing to some level markedly lower. A worker would exceed his/her quarterly exposure limit in about four hours in that environment.
What we don't know is the source of the radiation. The significant decline indicates (to me) that it originated from a point source rather than area contamination. If it was from a point source, the exposure levels closer to the source go up as the square of the distance. If that is the case, workers nearer to the source will exceed their limit that much quicker.
It is possible that reducing the number of workers on site is a measure intended to miinimize exposure.
In any case, our hearts must go out to the workers at that site. They have suffered personal losses like everyone else who lives in the surrounding area, yet they are at work trying to keep a bad situation from becoming much worse.
Kevin Snyder
SW2010 x64 SP3
Win 7 Pro
Core2 Quad Q6600 2.4Ghz 8Gb
NVIDIA Quadro FX570
3D Connexion SpacePilot Pro
(Disclaimer: what follows is from my Navy career which ended many years ago. I believe it to still be current)
To put that in perspective, the occupational limit in the US nuclear industry is 3,000 mrem (30,000 microsieverts) per quarter or 5,000 mrem (50,000 microsieverts) per year. This is based on a presumed "safe" level that does not add substantially to long-term cancer risks.
The Navy's limits when I was in were 300 mrem (3000 microsieverts) per quarter or 500 mrem (5000 microsieverts) per year.
Acute physical damage starts to occur at short-term exposure levels in the 50-100 rem (500,000-1,000,000 microsieverts) range. If the exposure level rises to 300-500 rem (3,000,000-5,000,000 microsieverts) the short-term survival odds drop to 50% or less..
At Fukushima, they reported a spike to 822 mrem (8217 microsieverts) at the perimeter, then decreasing to some level markedly lower. A worker would exceed his/her quarterly exposure limit in about four hours in that environment.
What we don't know is the source of the radiation. The significant decline indicates (to me) that it originated from a point source rather than area contamination. If it was from a point source, the exposure levels closer to the source go up as the square of the distance. If that is the case, workers nearer to the source will exceed their limit that much quicker.
It is possible that reducing the number of workers on site is a measure intended to miinimize exposure.
In any case, our hearts must go out to the workers at that site. They have suffered personal losses like everyone else who lives in the surrounding area, yet they are at work trying to keep a bad situation from becoming much worse.
Kevin Snyder
SW2010 x64 SP3
Win 7 Pro
Core2 Quad Q6600 2.4Ghz 8Gb
NVIDIA Quadro FX570
3D Connexion SpacePilot Pro