nlj
Materials
- Sep 13, 2007
- 46
I've been chasing a fuel hose failure for some time now. We switched suppliers in April 2009 and the new hoses are cracking whereas we have no report of the old supplier hoses cracking. The hoses are stored in a covered area while in service, so likely wouldn't see significant UV. I've been investigating what potential fluids/solvents may come in contact with the hoses, but there are no fluid tanks near these hoses. The application for the hoses involves diesel fuel.
I've ran FTIR, TGA and XRF on the hose materials.
The hoses have two layers and testing was conducted on both plies. I've labeled them OD for the outer ply and ID for the inner ply.
Results are:
New hose:
FTIR results:
OD: nitrile rubber, an ester-based plasticizer and talc
ID: Nitrile rubber, phthalate based plasticizer
Methylene chloride extraction spectra:
OD: ester-based oil
ID: phthalate based plasticizer
Old Hose:
FTIR:
OD: Nitrile rubber, ester based plasticizer
ID: Nitrile rubber, phthalate based plasticizer and a silicate filler
Methylene chloride extraction spectra:
OD
hthalate based plasticizer and a polyvinyl ester
ID: Phthalate based plasticizer
There don't seem to be any major differences between these materials that would result in one significantly out performing the other.
Does anyone have any thoughts to offer on why the new hose is not performing as well as the old hose? These hoses are made per API 1529. Should we be adding more to our print in terms of hose specifications?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
I've ran FTIR, TGA and XRF on the hose materials.
The hoses have two layers and testing was conducted on both plies. I've labeled them OD for the outer ply and ID for the inner ply.
Results are:
New hose:
FTIR results:
OD: nitrile rubber, an ester-based plasticizer and talc
ID: Nitrile rubber, phthalate based plasticizer
Methylene chloride extraction spectra:
OD: ester-based oil
ID: phthalate based plasticizer
Old Hose:
FTIR:
OD: Nitrile rubber, ester based plasticizer
ID: Nitrile rubber, phthalate based plasticizer and a silicate filler
Methylene chloride extraction spectra:
OD
ID: Phthalate based plasticizer
There don't seem to be any major differences between these materials that would result in one significantly out performing the other.
Does anyone have any thoughts to offer on why the new hose is not performing as well as the old hose? These hoses are made per API 1529. Should we be adding more to our print in terms of hose specifications?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!