Stache..
I assume that the "source" was the refuel source such as truck, pump, etc... Not just the acft tanks.
Suggest You consider checking other aircraft serviced by "the source"... to see if any of them show signs of [the same] contaminates.
Also, consider that contaminates are sometimes introduced in previous refuelings, in routine maintenance or hidden material deterioration [such as rubber or paint flaking/cracking or metallic corrosion]
May we presume that fuel chemistry was "nominal"??
Also... are the fuel lines large enough, and routed properly, to handle max flow-rates without vapor lock or flow stagnation, IE: no tube kinks, "choke-points", engine hot-spots, adequate ID's and smooth turns, etc??? Also factor in atmospheric conditions such as high temps, freezing temps [ice formation in lines??], altitude, prolonged flight in attitude(s) adverse for smooth fuel flow/pressure... etc.
Some study of USAF T-2 [modified Firefly] mishaps [accidents] due to engine failure [fuel starvation at low altitude with loss of control] might be useful.
Also... for human factors... when engine failed, did prop windmill with a dramatic increase in drag [sudden decrease in airspeed due to wind-milling prop drag] or adverse handling characteristics [such as reduced yaw or pitch stability for a large wind-milling prop]???
PS: I can’t help "helping"... I’ve been a USAF mishap investigator way-too-long.
Regards, Wil Taylor