Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Front/rear track width effects

Status
Not open for further replies.

rpmag

Automotive
Oct 15, 2004
105
I have accumulated some basic data on sporting car suspension. All are RWD with front or mid-engines.
Approximately 70% have a wider rear track and the remainder wider or equal front track. Switch to a racecar list and the percentage is reversed to 70% wider front track.
This racecar % could be accounted for by the need to accomodate rear rim width's, but is there another reason why there is such a predominance of wider rear track sporting road cars?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I did checked mu tire spring rate up using the cornering weight scales. You might allready know some numbers but here is mine anyway. 40 kg/mm, at 1,5 bar. Dimension 15 wheels x 13 wide x 24,5 diameter Avon slicks.
Goran Malmberg
 
That's reasonable. I usually use 1500 pounds/inch (about 30 kg/mm) in my calculations, but, for my purposes, I could probably be just as happy using your number. Unless you're a working engineer, tire data is not that easy to come by.
 
That's very stiff, almost twice what a typical production tire is at that pressure. Rule of thumb: pressure is about 80% of the spring rate at 2 bar, the rest is sidewalls.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
 
I checked the roll stiffness out using my ½ scale model. The A-arm is parallel and equal length in order to lessen Wr changes. The chassis has a bearing at ground level to create a fixed Rc so that a force applied only create a rotating moment to the chassis.

With a Tw of 600 mm we will now apply a force to the chassis at Cgh distance. The chassis roll get 9,5 dgr. Using the same force but a Tw of 800 mm the chassis will now roll 7,0 dgr.

As the suspension system here is a parallelogram the Wr in both the 600 and 800 cases remains the same. During heave there will therefore be no difference in deflection.

Goran Malmberg
 
an update for those who may be interested. Going through my database of front/rear track differences in sportscars a new fact has come to the fore. When I compared F/R track in cars released in the last 4 years the ratio has changed from that previously noted. It is now 3:1 wider at the front.
Wider at front:
Noble m15 89mm wider at front
Ferrari F430 53mm wider at the front
Lamb Gallardo 30mm wider at the front
Porsche Cayman 42mm wider at the rear
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor