Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

*friction,lagrange or *friction,rou 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

han_cyuan

Structural
Joined
Sep 20, 2023
Messages
31
Location
TW
*friction,lagrange or *friction,rough may cause convergence difficulty when used in conjunction with the *surface behavior, augmented lagrange or penalty option. Use penalty friction instead.
How to deal with it
 
The message is pretty self-explanatory. You should use the penalty friction formulation if you encounter convergence issues with rough or lagrange friction in conjunction with the penalty or augmented lagrange method for enforcement of contact constraints in the normal direction. If you don’t have convergence issues, you can ignore this message.
 
%E6%9C%AA%E5%91%BD%E5%90%8D_cxwpsh.jpg

I would like to ask if you need to set penalty friction in the following two steps.
 
There you should only set Friction formulation to Penalty. Unless you want to keep it as Frictionless, of course.
 
How many recommended parameters should be set?
%E6%9C%AA%E5%91%BD%E5%90%8D_m9manr.jpg
 
Just the friction coefficient.
 
Is there any numerical range limit?
 
It can be any non-negative value but it should make sense physically - check the friction coefficient for a given pair of materials in contact.
 
So I can't assume a friction coefficient on my own?
 
If you want realistic results, it has to make sense. But it’s easy to find approximate values for most common materials.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top