Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations 3DDave on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Frame vs fixed end beam

Status
Not open for further replies.

JStructsteel

Structural
Aug 22, 2002
1,462
So I am checking a beam part of a two story, single bay frame, and the moment i am getting from the frame analysis is almost opposite as that of a fixed beam. Fixed beam, I am using WL2/12 at ends, and WL2/24 at center. From the frame analysis I am almost opposite that. Has anyone ever encountered that before?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Fixed ends are infinitely rigid, attracting a lot more moment. The ends of the beam have zero rotation.

Ends of a beam in a frame are attached to columns that have some amount of flexibility - thus there is rotation at the ends of the beam and this dumps more moment into the center of the beam span.



Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
faq731-376
 
Thanks for the quick reply. In my case I am getting almost the opposite, WL2/12 in the center, WL2/24 at the ends. Perhaps its a fluke, but want to make sure.

I would have thought it would be a good gut check to just run a beam from a frame setup as a fixed end, and see if they were close.

im gonna check it with another program to see if I get similar reuslts.
 
JAE is correct, and your analysis is probably more correct than your intuition.

End Moments:

Zero rigidity (flexure) column: 0
Perfectly rigid column: WL2/12

So your end moment should fall between 0 and WL2/12, such as WL2/24, depending on the flexural rigidity of your column.
 
An experiment to conduct with your analysis. Change the size of your columns. Instead of what they are now (I'll assume 18" squares), replace them with 48" square columns..... Something way, way stiffer than what you've got now. See how the results move much closer to your perfectly fixed assumption?

Then replace them with really weak columns... Like 6" square columns. See how the moment at the mid-span of your beam moves much closer to WL^2/8?

That should give you a better feel for why the results are the way they are and how sensitive they are to the column size. There is no such thing, of course, as a perfectly pinned or perfectly fixed condition. This experiment just demonstrates it in a way that may be easier to grasp.
 
@ Joshplum, I did what you suggested, and got the results i expected. Thanks for everyones input
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor