menat, let us talk in common language. What marmite explained is for the two LVs of equal MVA rating. I don't know whether you intended the same or one LV and a TV of a lesser rating.
Let us take the case explained by marmite. Loosely coupled or de-coupled LVs= There is relatively high impedance for the two LVs in T circuit and you will see negligible impedance in the HV limb of T circuit. Then LV1-LV2 impedance ( adding up the Z of LV1 &LV2 in T circuit) become very high The two LVs will be one above the other and HV also will be in two parallel halves one above the other. In effect, these are two, double wound transformers axially placed, but outside only three circuits brought out -H,LV1 &LV2. You can put the LVs radially also, on both sides of HV and then the same "loosely coupled" feature will be obtained but bit more complex in design esp when HV has tappings for voltage control. When one LV is loaded, HV limb with less impedance, the voltage drop through H will be less and hence the joint of T circuit will see almost same H voltage ie the other unloaded LV terminal voltage ( H+ Lv2 drop) will not change (ie voltage regulation in one LV is not affecting the other LV)
With closely coupled LVs, winding arrangement can be as explained by marmite. But it can also be like Core-LV1-LV2-HV, all radially arranged on core limb. In this case you will see LV1-LV2 impedance is very low, being near to each other( ie closely coupled magnetically),but the HV limb of T will be of high impedance.