People keep putting them on wellsites. I had one installed 6 ft after a choke which dropped the pressure from 10,000 psig to 1,000 psig. The well made 20 MMCF/d of 1.3 BTU/SCF gas, 300 bbl/d of 40 API condensate, and 1,200 bbl/d of water ON AVERAGE. Problem was many of the constituents of the 1.3 BTU/SCF were liquid upstream of the choke and boiled off some distance downstream of the choke. There was no way to reliably determine the phase change point, but my intuition said it was farther than 6 ft. The other issue was that there was no snapshot in time that the well made 20 MMSCF/d, 300 bbl/d condensate, or 1,200 bbl/d water for more than a few nano seconds. The numbers were averages of a very broad range of values. Also, the heating value and the API changed from minute to minute. My client wanted to know why his high dollar MicroMotion was 40-80% off from his custody transfer meter and the sum of the tank volumes and run tickets.
In other words the meter only gave him meaningful numbers for those few nano seconds per month when the flow matched the averages. In a plant, you can put them on single-phase flow streams that only change density with pressure and temperature and get decent, repeatable results. But there are 50 other technologies that will do as well in that service.
Nothing does a good job with unknown and varying mixtures of fluids, but Emerson has been touting the Coriolis as just such a meter ever since they bought MicroMotion by claiming that the "measure density directly". Saying it a million times does not make it true.
David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.
The plural of anecdote is not "data"