New to the forum, looks like a great source. Glad I found it !!!!!
I have a failed flex hose from a steam system. (Very high pressure and vibration) THe construction is a corrugated tube (625 inco)on the inside, wrapped by 304 braided weave, and over both of these is a strain relief spring appling compressive force, it is also 304. The inner corrugated tube got severly worn and the pattern on it is from the braid, the failure was it wore right through under the strain relief.
So...why did the 36C (tube) inco material get worn from the 95B (braid) SS material? The outer strain relief hardly got worn also. Is the inconel more susceptable to wear? All three components would be "sliding" due to flexing and vibration. The main mechanical force is vibration though.
Here are the materials.
Stain relief---43.7 C on the outside
Braid---94.8 B in between
Corrugate tube--36.5 C wearing on the inside
I have a failed flex hose from a steam system. (Very high pressure and vibration) THe construction is a corrugated tube (625 inco)on the inside, wrapped by 304 braided weave, and over both of these is a strain relief spring appling compressive force, it is also 304. The inner corrugated tube got severly worn and the pattern on it is from the braid, the failure was it wore right through under the strain relief.
So...why did the 36C (tube) inco material get worn from the 95B (braid) SS material? The outer strain relief hardly got worn also. Is the inconel more susceptable to wear? All three components would be "sliding" due to flexing and vibration. The main mechanical force is vibration though.
Here are the materials.
Stain relief---43.7 C on the outside
Braid---94.8 B in between
Corrugate tube--36.5 C wearing on the inside