Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Flatness per unit length

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tunalover

Mechanical
Joined
Mar 28, 2002
Messages
1,179
Location
US
Folks-
A vendor has told me that the flatness of a specific area on a part is 0.001 inches/inch. How would I state this requirement using a feature control frame? I don't have Y14.5.
Thanks


Tunalover
 
Jim,
Some questions to you:
What if required length of the area in direction of dim. 200 was 20 and not 50. How would you specify the requirement?
What if I wanted to define per unit area as 20 x full width of the part? How would you do it?
 
To the OP -- you need an area, not a length. So you can't really say 0.001 inch per inch. It would be OK to say 0.001 inch per 1X1 area. But make sure that's what they want.

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
 
pmarc,
Neither scenario is illustrated in the standard, but I would look at using the X/Y/Z (uppercase) labels, to show the layout; in the second scenario, I would use the width dimension value rather than "full width X 20".

Flat| 0.1 / 20[X] X 90[Y]

This is an extension of principles, of course; supported by flatness per unit area AND in '09 (integrated from Y14.41 '03), the use of the X,Y,Z vectors based on drawing views. Though I haven't seen anyone do this yet, I don't see any conflict with the standard.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services TecEase, Inc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top