Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Fire Scenario restrictions?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bourbon103

Chemical
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
32
Location
GB
I have a heat exchanger that external fire is considered the controlling scenario for over-pressurization. Currently, relief is in the form of a 6" x 10" relief valve on the inlet to the shell ~1000 ft. away in another building.

I know per ASME XIII that an ASME coded vessel requires at least a minimally sized relief valve on its shell. Is there a restriction as far as how "local" the relief valve needs to be or is the only requirement that it passes 3% inlet pressure drop?
 
I don't know of any absolute distance restrictions for vapor scenarios (other than 3% loss as you mentioned). But you are going to need a long run of large pipe to keep under 3% (if even possible). This is going to be a high installation cost solution. Try adding fire proof insulation or something like that to reduce the required rate and decrease the size of that relief valve.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top