CPENG78
Civil/Environmental
- Sep 2, 2008
- 186
All,
Its been a while for me but for fire flows in the past I was used to receiving my static pressure, flow and residual pressure. I would then either graphically or mathematically would utilize these numbers to predict how the system performed to say either at minimum pressure of 25 or 20 psi.
I've received a flow test that includes a Static of 44 psi, residual pressure of 25 psi and a pitot pressure of 11 psi.
Using Q = 29.83 x c x d^2 x p^0.5 I'm arriving at 556 gpm as the flow (assuming c=0.9 and d=2.5 inches)
This gets me the flow of 556 gpm with a residual pressure of 25 psi.
Projecting this using your typical logarithmic graph for water flow and pressure, this results in about 630 gpm when the pressure goes down to 20 psi in the system.
Am I approaching this correctly? In short, I'm using the pitot pressure to arrive at my residual flow. In other words the pitot pressure is not necessarily the same as the system residual pressure.
Please advice,
Its been a while for me but for fire flows in the past I was used to receiving my static pressure, flow and residual pressure. I would then either graphically or mathematically would utilize these numbers to predict how the system performed to say either at minimum pressure of 25 or 20 psi.
I've received a flow test that includes a Static of 44 psi, residual pressure of 25 psi and a pitot pressure of 11 psi.
Using Q = 29.83 x c x d^2 x p^0.5 I'm arriving at 556 gpm as the flow (assuming c=0.9 and d=2.5 inches)
This gets me the flow of 556 gpm with a residual pressure of 25 psi.
Projecting this using your typical logarithmic graph for water flow and pressure, this results in about 630 gpm when the pressure goes down to 20 psi in the system.
Am I approaching this correctly? In short, I'm using the pitot pressure to arrive at my residual flow. In other words the pitot pressure is not necessarily the same as the system residual pressure.
Please advice,