Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Fillet Weld Termination

Status
Not open for further replies.

fabengr

Structural
Nov 29, 2009
30
I have been dealing with the issue of how a fillet weld should be terminated for some time. As a fabricator years and years ago I was tought that a fillet weld should be stopped a weld size back from the end of the parts being joined. In the 2005 AISC spec there is a user note that say this is correct. I can't find anything in any AWS bood that tells me this. I am now working on a railroad bridge where the shop welded some stiffeners to the end of the part. I can't find in the D1.5 where this is wrong. Any advice.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

See D1.5 2.8.1.7 and 2.8.1.8 depending on the application.

In regards to the latter, fillets on opposite sides of a common plane of contact shall be interrupted at a corner common to both welds.
 
Thank you for this information but what I am looking for is something about the termination of a weld when it is (for example) a lap weld and the fillet is continued all the way to the end of the two lapped parts.
 
Unfortunately, I don't think it's in D1.5 or AREMA. My employer puts the requirement in their standard project specifications.

There is some commentary about this in D1.5-2008; check out the first full paragraph on page 361.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies: faq731-376
 
You may be thinking of a "hold-back" where the fillet weld terminates at a free edge of a tension member. Using AWS D1.1-2006 as the reference, look at figure 2.6 and clause 2.8.3.2.

Other editions of D1.1 list a similar requirement.

Best regards - Al
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor