I'm surprised there's much of a market in FEA consultancy, most people do it inhouse as it's the only way to get good quality and improved processes. After all, most of the real expense is getting the supporting test data and using it to validate the model. It's in the consultant's interest to do the acceptable bare minimum amount of correlation, whereas internally the Test group will be doing everything in their power to make sure that the FE guys use that expensive data properly (guess which side of the fence I've been on for most of my life).
Coupled with the problem that you need the answer NOW, and the consultant lacks the same sense of urgency, I wouldn't mind betting most external FEA projects leave a slightly bitter taste.
I agree, the productivity of a good FEA guy can easily be 4 times that of an average one, and the bad ones are just a black hole.
Cheers
Greg Locock
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.