Jun 27, 2008 #1 gio1 Automotive Joined Jun 28, 2003 Messages 83 Location GB Hello Which equivalent stress should I use for fatigue calculations on a shaft subject to pure torsion? Von Mises and Maximum principal differ significantly in this case and give hugely different fatigue lifes. Thanks Gio1
Hello Which equivalent stress should I use for fatigue calculations on a shaft subject to pure torsion? Von Mises and Maximum principal differ significantly in this case and give hugely different fatigue lifes. Thanks Gio1
Jul 1, 2008 #2 MotorVib Mechanical Joined Mar 14, 2008 Messages 150 Location US I generial use Von Mises. Its is also what most FEA show. What type of load do you have with pure torsion? If you want to be on the safe side go with the shorter life. Chris "In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics." Homer Simpson Upvote 0 Downvote
I generial use Von Mises. Its is also what most FEA show. What type of load do you have with pure torsion? If you want to be on the safe side go with the shorter life. Chris "In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics." Homer Simpson
Jul 1, 2008 #3 rb1957 Aerospace Joined Apr 15, 2005 Messages 16,134 Location CA this is the 2nd kick at the cat for this topic ? i'd use principal, but then Petersen bases his Kt on shear stress = T*16/(pi*d^3), refer fig 79, pg 105. but then in this case principal = shear, no? Upvote 0 Downvote
this is the 2nd kick at the cat for this topic ? i'd use principal, but then Petersen bases his Kt on shear stress = T*16/(pi*d^3), refer fig 79, pg 105. but then in this case principal = shear, no?
Jul 2, 2008 Thread starter #4 gio1 Automotive Joined Jun 28, 2003 Messages 83 Location GB rb1957 Yes this topic has moved to the FEA section, sorry. Your point is interesting, if Petersen used max principal for Kt then it must apply for fatigue (Kt is the concentration factor for fatigue, right?) Thanks Gio1 Upvote 0 Downvote
rb1957 Yes this topic has moved to the FEA section, sorry. Your point is interesting, if Petersen used max principal for Kt then it must apply for fatigue (Kt is the concentration factor for fatigue, right?) Thanks Gio1
Jul 2, 2008 Thread starter #5 gio1 Automotive Joined Jun 28, 2003 Messages 83 Location GB Sorry, I think the concentration factor in fatigue is Kf... Upvote 0 Downvote
Jul 2, 2008 #6 rb1957 Aerospace Joined Apr 15, 2005 Messages 16,134 Location CA Kt is general usage (in my mind at least) for stress concentration. some folks make a distinction between stress concentration for static loads and stress concentration for fatigue Upvote 0 Downvote
Kt is general usage (in my mind at least) for stress concentration. some folks make a distinction between stress concentration for static loads and stress concentration for fatigue