May 29, 2014 #1 GMarsh Mechanical Joined Sep 30, 2011 Messages 123 Location IN Hi, Are certain fatigue criteria more relevant for certain type of materials? I heard that Gerber is good for ductile materials, etc. So can we use criterion based on material? Any particular reference on this? Thank you Geoff
Hi, Are certain fatigue criteria more relevant for certain type of materials? I heard that Gerber is good for ductile materials, etc. So can we use criterion based on material? Any particular reference on this? Thank you Geoff
May 29, 2014 #2 metengr Materials Joined Oct 2, 2003 Messages 15,478 Location US http://www.public.iastate.edu/~e_m.424/Fatigue.pdf Upvote 0 Downvote
May 30, 2014 #3 TVP Materials Joined Apr 12, 2002 Messages 4,592 Location US https://www.efatigue.com/efatigue.html Upvote 0 Downvote
Aug 18, 2014 1 #4 bxtsafe Mechanical Joined Feb 6, 2011 Messages 56 Location BR > The following information are valid for high-cycle fatigue (S-N method): For steels and metals in general, the best fatigue criteria are classified in this sequence: 1) Walker model 2) Morrow model 3) SWT model (Smith–Watson–Topper model) For Aluminium and titanium alloys, the best fatigue criteria are classified in this sequence: 1) Walker model 2) SWT model 3) Morrow model Source: http://www.ewp.rpi.edu/hartford/~ernesto/F2011/EP/MaterialsforStudents/DeRosa/Dowling2004.pdf Upvote 0 Downvote
> The following information are valid for high-cycle fatigue (S-N method): For steels and metals in general, the best fatigue criteria are classified in this sequence: 1) Walker model 2) Morrow model 3) SWT model (Smith–Watson–Topper model) For Aluminium and titanium alloys, the best fatigue criteria are classified in this sequence: 1) Walker model 2) SWT model 3) Morrow model Source: http://www.ewp.rpi.edu/hartford/~ernesto/F2011/EP/MaterialsforStudents/DeRosa/Dowling2004.pdf